From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: RLS: Fix ALL vs. SELECT+UPDATE policy usage |
Date: | 2017-05-07 01:48:37 |
Message-ID: | E1d7BJN-0003Ay-LG@gemulon.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
RLS: Fix ALL vs. SELECT+UPDATE policy usage
When we add the SELECT-privilege based policies to the RLS with check
options (such as for an UPDATE statement, or when we have INSERT ...
RETURNING), we need to be sure and use the 'USING' case if the policy is
actually an 'ALL' policy (which could have both a USING clause and an
independent WITH CHECK clause).
This could result in policies acting differently when built using ALL
(when the ALL had both USING and WITH CHECK clauses) and when building
the policies independently as SELECT and UPDATE policies.
Fix this by adding an explicit boolean to add_with_check_options() to
indicate when the USING policy should be used, even if the policy has
both USING and WITH CHECK policies on it.
Reported by: Rod Taylor
Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS was introduced.
Branch
------
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d617c7629c0806a245555c0fe74331935c726569
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/rewrite/rowsecurity.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-07 02:24:27 | pgsql: Allow queries submitted by postgres_fdw to be canceled. |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-05-07 00:04:32 | pgsql: Fix duplicated words in comment. |