| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | pgsql: Cleanup of rewriter and planner handling of Query.hasRowSecurity | 
| Date: | 2016-11-10 21:16:38 | 
| Message-ID: | E1c4wi6-0003rO-8Q@gemulon.postgresql.org | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers | 
Cleanup of rewriter and planner handling of Query.hasRowSecurity flag.
Be sure to pull up the subquery's hasRowSecurity flag when flattening a
subquery in pull_up_simple_subquery().  This isn't a bug today because
we don't look at the hasRowSecurity flag during planning, but it could
easily be a bug tomorrow.
Likewise, make rewriteRuleAction() pull up the hasRowSecurity flag when
absorbing RTEs from a rule action.  This isn't a bug either, for the
opposite reason: the flag should never be set yet.  But again, it seems
like good future proofing.
Add a comment explaining why rewriteTargetView() should *not* set
hasRowSecurity when adding stuff to securityQuals.
Improve some nearby comments about securityQuals processing, and document
that field more completely in parsenodes.h.
Patch by me, analysis by Dean Rasheed.
Discussion: <CAEZATCXZ8tb2DV6f=bkhsMV6u_gRcZ0CZBw2J-qU84RxSukZog(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/24aef33804be5d7d71bc3932ced3407fce71e354
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c |  3 +++
src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c      | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h            |  9 ++++++++-
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-11-11 17:04:17 | pgsql: Doc: fix data types of FuncCallContext's call_cntr and max_calls | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-11-10 20:01:18 | pgsql: Re-allow user_catalog_table option for materialized views. |