Quick Links

pgsql: Correct statement to actually be the intended assert statement.

From:	Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To:	pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	pgsql: Correct statement to actually be the intended assert statement.
Date:	2015-12-14 10:27:48
Message-ID:	E1a8QM8-0003na-Hv@gemulon.postgresql.org
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-committers

Correct statement to actually be the intended assert statement.

e3f4cfc7 introduced a LWLockHeldByMe() call, without the corresponding
Assert() surrounding it.

Spotted by Coverity.

Backpatch: 9.1+, like the previous commit

Branch
------
REL9_1_STABLE

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Andres Freund	2015-12-14 10:55:25	pgsql: Fix bug in SetOffsetVacuumLimit() triggered by find_multixact_st
Previous Message	Andres Freund	2015-12-14 10:27:44	pgsql: Correct statement to actually be the intended assert statement.