From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GU |
Date: | 2015-10-05 10:01:53 |
Message-ID: | E1Zj2af-0001dF-V0@gemulon.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GUC limits.
In 020235a5754 I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums to
allow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch the
corresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purpose
of wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well.
It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit for
autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, even
before 020235a5754.
Discussion: 26377(dot)1443105453(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Backpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch
Branch
------
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0577821b57253d0ae43ffdddc8f94f07866830ae
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-10-05 10:01:55 | pgsql: Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GU |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-10-05 10:01:52 | pgsql: Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GU |