From: | ryan(at)cs(dot)utah(dot)edu |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | BUG #6370: manual does not discuss transactional DDL |
Date: | 2012-01-02 07:52:48 |
Message-ID: | E1RhchM-0001oe-Bw@wrigleys.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6370
Logged by: Ryan Culpepper
Email address: ryan(at)cs(dot)utah(dot)edu
PostgreSQL version: Unsupported/Unknown
Operating system: not applicable
Description:
This is a documentation bug (or feature request), not a software bug.
There seems to be no discussion of transactional DDL in the manual itself
(that I could find). A brief Google search turned up the following relevant
pages:
-
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Transactional_DDL_in_PostgreSQL:_A_Competitive_Analysis
- http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Why_PostgreSQL_Instead_of_MySQL_2009 (see
section "Transactional DDL")
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2007-08/msg00273.php (and
other messages in that thread)
But I could not find a place in the manual that authoritatively states that
DDL is transactional. (Such a page should probably also discuss things like
session variables, etc.)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vitaly83 | 2012-01-02 12:49:11 | BUG #6371: Installation process |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-01-01 01:54:53 | Documentation bug: reference to checkpoint activity in bgwriter |