pgsql: Role membership of superusers is only by explicit membership for

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Role membership of superusers is only by explicit membership for
Date: 2011-11-03 20:34:52
Message-ID: E1RM3zw-0002R7-5L@gemulon.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Role membership of superusers is only by explicit membership for HBA.

Document that this rule applies to 'samerole' as well as to named roles.

Per gripe from Tom Lane.

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f66c8252ab9a64dd49a0af2b481a2621dd008768

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-11-03 21:54:29 pgsql: Fix inline_set_returning_function() to allow multiple OUT parame
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-11-03 20:04:03 Re: pgsql: Do not treat a superuser as a member of every role for HBA purpo