From: | "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "'Roderick A(dot) Anderson'" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>, "'Pg Advocacy'" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL |
Date: | 2005-09-09 03:19:50 |
Message-ID: | E1EDZQs-0005xp-3c@lerami.lerctr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
I have a 3.4.3 RT using PG quite happily.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Roderick A.
Anderson
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 10:51 PM
To: Pg Advocacy
Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL
I've been away from the site and mailing list for better than a year so was
surprised as all get out that MySQL is ther recommended database for RT. The
version I installed over four years ago uses Pg.
My question is does anyone know why they decided to go with MySQL? ( Pg
7.3 or above is an alternative; as is Oracle ). I would ask the RT list but
don't want to get into any flaming combats and was hoping someone here might
know ( having risked being charred. )
Thanks,
Rod
--
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Browne | 2005-09-09 16:59:22 | Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL |
Previous Message | Roderick A. Anderson | 2005-09-09 02:51:21 | Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL |