Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL

From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: "'Roderick A(dot) Anderson'" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>, "'Pg Advocacy'" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL
Date: 2005-09-09 03:19:50
Message-ID: E1EDZQs-0005xp-3c@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

I have a 3.4.3 RT using PG quite happily.

LER

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Roderick A.
Anderson
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 10:51 PM
To: Pg Advocacy
Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL

I've been away from the site and mailing list for better than a year so was
surprised as all get out that MySQL is ther recommended database for RT. The
version I installed over four years ago uses Pg.

My question is does anyone know why they decided to go with MySQL? ( Pg
7.3 or above is an alternative; as is Oracle ). I would ask the RT list but
don't want to get into any flaming combats and was hoping someone here might
know ( having risked being charred. )

Thanks,
Rod
--

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2005-09-09 16:59:22 Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL
Previous Message Roderick A. Anderson 2005-09-09 02:51:21 Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL