Re: timestamp.c

From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr>, "'pgsql-hackers list'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: timestamp.c
Date: 2005-08-29 01:46:14
Message-ID: E1E9Yjs-0002FA-NB@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yeah, I think it's a timing thing on when the fix was committed and when
Beta1 was pulled.

It will be in the next beta/release based on the commit I saw.

LER

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 9:17 AM
To: pgsql-hackers list
Subject: [HACKERS] timestamp.c

Hi,

It seems the timestamp.c patch to getg around the SCO optimizer bug did'nt
get in beta1....

Is it normal?

Regards

--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-08-29 02:51:43 Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-29 00:47:29 Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Thread safetyness