From: | "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr>, "'pgsql-hackers list'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: timestamp.c |
Date: | 2005-08-29 01:46:14 |
Message-ID: | E1E9Yjs-0002FA-NB@lerami.lerctr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Yeah, I think it's a timing thing on when the fix was committed and when
Beta1 was pulled.
It will be in the next beta/release based on the commit I saw.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 9:17 AM
To: pgsql-hackers list
Subject: [HACKERS] timestamp.c
Hi,
It seems the timestamp.c patch to getg around the SCO optimizer bug did'nt
get in beta1....
Is it normal?
Regards
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-08-29 02:51:43 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-29 00:47:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Thread safetyness |