| From: | Ian FREISLICH <if(at)hetzner(dot)co(dot)za> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding. |
| Date: | 2005-05-24 08:26:24 |
| Message-ID: | E1DaUk4-000HNa-Gu@hetzner.co.za |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway wrote:
> Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > I'm not sure if you've done this for a later version of pg_autovacuum.
> > I'm using what came with postgres-7.4.6. For database security on
> > a shared server (~800 logins) it's best to set the superuser password
> > and not allow passwordless connections. The only thing is that
> > pg_autovacuum keeps the password supplied on the commandline so
> > anyone that does a 'ps' can get the database superuser password.
>
> Is this portable? Considering the hoops that
> backend/utils/misc/ps_status.c jumps through to do something similar for
> the postmaster, I would guess not.
>
> BTW, I would suggest using ~/.pgpass, as that should be secure on all
> platforms.
I have no idea. It works on FreeBSD and Linux which are the two
platform I have access to.
Does pg_autovacuum use ~/.pgpass?
Ian
--
Ian Freislich
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-24 10:03:54 | Re: [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding. |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-24 08:06:19 | Re: plperl tests for currently untested features |