Re: Is there any support like "for update wait N" in PostgreSQL?

From: "fanlijing" <fanlijing(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "'Albe Laurenz'" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there any support like "for update wait N" in PostgreSQL?
Date: 2011-12-09 03:17:36
Message-ID: E1DAC77393D04EF991DC898BCB9FAB34@fanlijing
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hello Laurenz

Thank you for your rapid reply.

Using statement_timeout is indeed the only-way to get a similar
functionality as "for update wait N" in oracle. It doesn't affect the
functionality at all.

As I said in the previous mail that this porting method affects the
functionality, it is finally verified as a bug in my program.

In a work, the porting method has no problem.

Sorry for interrupting you so many times.

Best Regards from a Chinese girl~ (*^__^*)

Yours,
Fan LiJing(范丽菁)
2011-12-9
-----Original Message-----
From: Albe Laurenz [mailto:laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 4:08 PM
To: fanlijing *EXTERN*; pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: Is there any support like "for update wait N" in PostgreSQL?

fanlijing wrote:
> Actually, now I'm confused with another problem, that is:
> Oracle: for update wait 10
> PostgreSQL: no support for the parameter "wait"
>
> What should I do when I'm doing porting on this point?
> If I get rid of the parameter "wait", there would be a dead lock in my
program...
> Is there any support like "for update wait N" in PostgreSQL?
>
> I'm waiting for your reply.
>
> Thank you so much any way.
>
>
########################################################################
####
>
> Following is my porting method, although it avoid the dead-lock
problem, but it affect the
> functionality.
>
> SELECT DOMAIN_ID, DOMAIN_NAME...FOR UPDATE WAIT 10 ORDER BY ...
> ->
> SELECT DOMAIN_ID, DOMAIN_NAME...ORDER BY ... FOR UPDATE

[...]
> queryRunner.update(conn, "set statement_timeout = 10000");
[...]
> Following is the exception when run my program...
[...]
> ....***SqlException: ERROR: canceling statement due to statement
timeout Query: SELECT... ORDER BY ... FOR
> UPDATE Parameters: [yun_SF_18, 0]

There is no "WAIT n" clause in PostgreSQL, and using statement_timeout
as
you did is the only way to get a similar functionality.

But you seem unhappy with this approach.
How does it affect the functionality?

If you use "WAIT n" in Oracle, you will get an error message (ORA-30006)
similar to using statement_timeout in PostgreSQL.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rural Hunter 2011-12-09 07:19:42 hot standby failed to start
Previous Message Gene Poole 2011-12-08 15:04:37 Re: [GENERAL] Convert / Migrate From Oracle 11gR2 To PostgreSQL ? On CentOS 5.7 x86_64