| From: | Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user |
| Date: | 2003-06-12 14:00:33 |
| Message-ID: | E19QScz-00089O-Mo@skipper.averillpark.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12 Jun 2003 08:50:30 -0500 Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> wrote:
> A table *is* a relation. You seem to be referring to foreign keys.
> Maybe MySQL has a different syntax?
last time i checked, MySQL didn't do referential integrity. it did accept
some syntax for describing foreign keys, but treated it as a no-op. this
could be different in MySQL 4.x, i haven't looked into it. i rarely need to
work with MySQL, most of my clients who want me to do database stuff are
using PostgreSQL.
richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergei Levchenko | 2003-06-12 14:05:56 | tsearch - v2 |
| Previous Message | Mattias Kregert | 2003-06-12 13:58:28 | Re: How to change column type in PostgreSQL 7.1.2 |