Re: Handling users

From: Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Handling users
Date: 2003-02-18 15:22:53
Message-ID: E18l9a9-0001Re-00@skipper.averillpark.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:13:51 +0530 "Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
> I don't want to do that unless that is last option. And yes, the
> application
> and database are on same machine and it will be unix domain socket only
> for
> security reasons. ( I mean just trying to be paranoid. The application
> is on
> company intranet but why take chance?)

actually, this is perfectly reasonable. the vast majority of penetrations
are really inside jobs.

richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security

In response to

  • Re: Handling users at 2003-02-18 13:43:51 from Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Ivanov 2003-02-18 15:34:19 Re: Index not used with IS NULL
Previous Message Mark Cave-Ayland 2003-02-18 15:20:36 7.3.1 takes long time to vacuum table?