From: | Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Handling users |
Date: | 2003-02-18 15:22:53 |
Message-ID: | E18l9a9-0001Re-00@skipper.averillpark.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:13:51 +0530 "Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
> I don't want to do that unless that is last option. And yes, the
> application
> and database are on same machine and it will be unix domain socket only
> for
> security reasons. ( I mean just trying to be paranoid. The application
> is on
> company intranet but why take chance?)
actually, this is perfectly reasonable. the vast majority of penetrations
are really inside jobs.
richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrei Ivanov | 2003-02-18 15:34:19 | Re: Index not used with IS NULL |
Previous Message | Mark Cave-Ayland | 2003-02-18 15:20:36 | 7.3.1 takes long time to vacuum table? |