| From: | "Johann Zuschlag" <zuschlag(at)online(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Error while restoring database |
| Date: | 2001-10-21 12:45:03 |
| Message-ID: | E15vHvs-0005fd-00@mrelay01.kundenserver.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 12:36:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>That's what you showed us already. What I'd like to see is the
>original database contents, particularly
>
> select * from pg_operator where oid = 280343;
> select * from pg_operator where oid = 280344;
>
>so we can see why pg_dump is producing the bogus output.
I'm sorry. I'm not so deep in the internals of postgreSQL. I'm just
doing some psqlodbc-supports and tests.
Attached you find the results of the above selects.
regards
Johann Zuschlag
zuschlag(at)online(dot)de
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_operator.txt | text/plain | 1.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-21 16:42:57 | Re: Error while restoring database |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-10-21 12:28:01 | Creating unique constraints on OID |