From: | "Gowey, Geoffrey" <ggowey(at)rxhope(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Dr(dot) Evil'" <drevil(at)sidereal(dot)kz>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | RE: PL/java? |
Date: | 2001-08-26 00:08:44 |
Message-ID: | E15F4B031E17D5118B18009027F67927DAC0@SERVER |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
probably a bad idea. From what I've heard the speed of your java program is
wholely dependent on the speed of your vm (and most aren't that quick).
Although it would be nice to have just to say we have it and mysql doesn't
(then again mysql doesn't have a whole lot of things that pgsql already
has).
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. Evil [mailto:drevil(at)sidereal(dot)kz]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 7:38 PM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [GENERAL] PL/java?
What do you think of having java as a procedural language available in
PG? It seems like java has many advantages.
I'm just wondering if people have thoughts or ideas on this, and if
someone is actually working on it, that would be cool.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2001-08-26 00:22:12 | Re: PL/java? |
Previous Message | Peter Lauko | 2001-08-26 00:06:43 | Re: Re: problems on solaris 7 (part 2) |