| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? |
| Date: | 2007-05-14 10:56:22 |
| Message-ID: | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA5790211ECCC@m0143.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Close. There was an Msys build from the 9th running on port 5432.
> 2) VC++ and Msys builds will both happily start on the same
> port at the same time. The first one to start listens on 5432
> until it shuts down, at which point the second server takes
> over seamlessly! It doesn't matter which is started first -
> it's as if Windows is queuing up the listens on the port.
Um, we explicitly set SO_REUSEADDR. So the port will happily allow a
second bind.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307175 quote:
"If you use SO_REUSADDR to bind multiple servers to the same port at the
same time, only one random listening socket accepts a connection
request."
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2007-05-14 10:57:32 | Re: plperl vs. bytea |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-05-14 10:08:43 | Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view |