From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "NikhilS" <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
Date: | 2007-03-07 13:34:16 |
Message-ID: | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA57901D42CF3@m0143.s-mxs.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > iv) Based on the PRIMARY, UNIQUE, REFERENCES information specified,
> > pass it on to the children tables.
>
> How will you maintain a primary key in such a table,
> considering that indexes can't span multiple tables?
Many partitioning schemes have (or can be made to have) only one
possible target partition for the primary key. Thus if you create
separate unique indexes on each partition the problem is solved.
For a first version I opt, that it is sufficient to disallow creation of
a unique index on the master, when the constraints (on columns of this
index) do not nail down a specific partition for each row (e.g. a hash
or a range on one of the index columns that does not overlap).
Later, global index, or indexes with separate partitioning rules can be
implemented, that cover the other cases.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2007-03-07 14:02:01 | Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes |
Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2007-03-07 11:53:08 | Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | NikhilS | 2007-03-07 14:29:48 | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
Previous Message | NikhilS | 2007-03-07 11:52:57 | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |