| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Mario Weilguni" <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RESET CONNECTION? |
| Date: | 2006-07-19 08:00:36 |
| Message-ID: | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA579012B443D@m0143.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Will this patch make it into 8.2?
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php
> > >
> > > It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools
like pgpool.
> >
> > No, it will not because RESET CONNECTION can mess up interface code
> > that doesn't want the connection reset. We are not sure how to
handle that.
Imho, if it where at the protocol level, that would not be such an
issue.
If the interface gives access to the protocol level it is already
depending
on good will.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-07-19 09:06:48 | pgxs problem |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD | 2006-07-19 07:56:06 | Re: [SQL] using constraint based paritioning to fix EAV type schemas? (view inheritance and constraints) |