From: | "Garcia, Joshua" <Joshua(dot)Garcia(at)xerox(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "John DeSoi" <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: The old pl/pgsql editor question back again |
Date: | 2006-08-04 14:55:00 |
Message-ID: | E00A3B716AD4C84FB97E42367015E8A00BFF36@usa5911mf01.na.xerox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
I just tried out your editor and it looks pretty good. There are two
features I would deem absolutely necessary that no single editor I have
used seems to have. These are:
- syntax highlighting that is smart enough to look akward when a syntax
error is made. I think nedit does a pretty good job of this. emacs
syntax highlighting I've tried is pretty weak, but I really like emacs
and use it a lot.
- smart indention like emacs has in its c-mode. I've seen editors have
no automatic/smart indention or the indention just doesn't work properly
for pl/pgsql
Josh
-----Original Message-----
From: John DeSoi [mailto:desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 4:30 AM
To: Garcia, Joshua
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] The old pl/pgsql editor question back again
On Aug 3, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Garcia, Joshua wrote:
> Have better editors popped up for pl/pgsql since the last
> discussion about pl/pgsql editors in the mailing lists? Or have
> the features for the most popular pl/pgsql editors improved since
> the last discussion?
What features are you looking for that existing products don't have?
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
http://pgedit.com/
Power Tools for PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Garcia, Joshua | 2006-08-04 14:56:45 | Re: pl/pgsql indentation emacs |
Previous Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2006-08-04 13:59:12 | Re: pg_dump sequence problem |