RE: Range partitioning and overlap

From: Edson Richter <edsonrichter(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Range partitioning and overlap
Date: 2020-11-13 21:08:06
Message-ID: DM6PR13MB3988A66E9D2BCCD499B550ABCFE60@DM6PR13MB3988.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-general

De: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Enviado: sexta-feira, 13 de novembro de 2020 17:58
Para: Edson Richter <edsonrichter(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>; pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Assunto: Re: Range partitioning and overlap

Edson Richter <edsonrichter(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> Further on the documentation: "When creating a range partition, the lower bound specified with FROM is an inclusive bound, whereas the upper bound specified with TO is an exclusive bound."

> I'm pretty sure I cannot find this statement in PostgreSQL 13 documentation page about partitioning. May be this statement is in another page?

It's in the CREATE TABLE reference page. Seems like it would be a good
idea to have it also in ddl.sgml's discussion of partitioning, though.

regards, tom lane

Thanks!

Regards,

Edson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-11-14 02:13:34 Partitioning docs (was Re: Range partitioning and overlap)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-11-13 20:58:04 Re: Range partitioning and overlap

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atul Kumar 2020-11-13 21:33:47 checkpoint occurs too frequently
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-11-13 20:58:04 Re: Range partitioning and overlap