RE: Documentation issue with pg_stat_recovery_prefetch

From: "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, sirisha chamarthi <sirichamarthi22(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Documentation issue with pg_stat_recovery_prefetch
Date: 2022-04-20 12:38:54
Message-ID: DM4PR84MB1734D8AEA26FF6AB463F764FEEF59@DM4PR84MB1734.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Thank you for developing the new feature.
The pg_stat_recovery_prefetch view documentation doesn't seem to have a description of the stats_reset column. The attached small patch adds a description of the stats_reset column.

Regards,
Noriyoshi Shinoda

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 6:23 PM
To: sirisha chamarthi <sirichamarthi22(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation issue with pg_stat_recovery_prefetch

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 8:11 AM sirisha chamarthi <sirichamarthi22(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I was going through pg_stat_recovery_prefetch documentation and saw an issue with formatting. Attached a small patch to fix the issue. This is the first time I am sending an email to hackers. Please educate me if I miss something.

Thanks Sirisha!

Ouch, that's embarrassing. My best guess is that I might have screwed that up a long time ago while rebasing an early development version over commit 92f94686, which changed the link style and moved paragraphs around, and then never noticed that it was wrong.
Researching that made me notice another problem: the table was using the 3 column layout from a couple of years ago, because I had also missed the style change in commit a0427506. Oops. Fixed.

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_stat_recovery_prefetch_doc_v1.diff application/octet-stream 781 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-04-20 12:51:52 Re: Logical replication timeout problem
Previous Message Thom Brown 2022-04-20 12:32:01 Re: generalized conveyor belt storage