| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: linked list rewrite |
| Date: | 2004-04-28 23:22:10 |
| Message-ID: | DFCB279A-996A-11D8-AC99-000A95AB279E@samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 28-Apr-04, at 12:12 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I never liked "cell" myself. It is too vague to me. But I see your
> point that list_head you would think returns the head of the list, not
> the first element in the list.
I'm not sure what you mean: list_head() returns the "head of the list",
which is the first cell in the list. That cell contains a data value
and a pointer to the next cell in the list. Makes sense to me...
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-04-28 23:29:09 | Re: linked list rewrite |
| Previous Message | Paul Tillotson | 2004-04-28 23:13:16 | Re: Postgre and Web Request |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-04-28 23:29:09 | Re: linked list rewrite |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-04-28 20:48:43 | Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning |