Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

From: Michael Brusser <michael(at)synchronicity(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pgsql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?
Date: 2003-10-14 16:09:09
Message-ID: DEEIJKLFNJGBEMBLBAHCKEJLDMAA.michael@synchronicity.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yes, we use NFS. Many of our customers use it as well.
Mike.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
... ...

> Michael Brusser <michael(at)synchronicity(dot)com> writes:
> > 2003-10-10 22:37:05 ERROR: cannot read block 0 of s_noteimportlinks:
> > Interrupted system call
>
> Hmm. I found this hard to believe at first, but indeed my local man
> pages for read() and write() say they can return EINTR if interrupted
> by a signal. This may depend on the filesystem in use (are you using
> NFS?)
>
> We had probably better fix fd.c to retry on EINTR.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Spraul 2003-10-14 16:26:34 Re: fix for strict-alias warnings
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-10-14 16:04:15 Re: fix for strict-alias warnings