| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: LIMIT NULL |
| Date: | 2009-02-02 21:44:15 |
| Message-ID: | DEC99081-56C9-4570-AB41-1B94FE2DCF7D@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Seems to me that the SELECT reference page is a more appropriate
>>> place
>>> for this type of detail. I've applied a patch there.
>
>> What about both?
>
> We don't really have space to document every little niggling detail in
> two places; if we did that, the main docs would become unreadably
> dense.
What, disk space? What do you mean by “space”?
> (I think it's justifiable to regard this as a "niggling detail"
> because
> no one's asked about it before.)
Sure.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-02-02 21:52:53 | Re: LIMIT NULL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-02 21:10:15 | Re: LIMIT NULL |