| From: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Петър Славов <pet(dot)slavov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2022-05-23 13:06:10 |
| Message-ID: | DE5FB1FE-AADB-4123-AA2F-E196154A1A85@yandex-team.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> 23 мая 2022 г., в 15:49, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> написал(а):
>
> I've transformed Peter's test into TAP test that runs ~20 seconds and reliably reproduces problem on my laptop.
I found out one interesting thing: unindexed tuple (that comes from amcheck scan) does not exist in heap page at the moment of check fail.
I've added ReadBuffer() in case of bloom_lacks_element() and ItemIdHasStorage() is false.
I understand that this description is a too vague, so I attached a patch for amcheck relaxing bt_index_check() so the test would pass.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| skip_vacuumed_tuple.diff | application/octet-stream | 1.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2022-05-23 17:51:39 | BUG #17491: PgAgent keeps failing |
| Previous Message | Andrey Borodin | 2022-05-23 10:49:02 | Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY |