Re: Re: One transaction by connection - commit subdetails without release master transaction?

From: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
Cc: Durumdara <durumdara(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: One transaction by connection - commit subdetails without release master transaction?
Date: 2012-02-29 23:00:30
Message-ID: DC4A61D0-EAEF-43A0-979F-1570FA4BA2D5@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 29 Feb 2012, at 20:44, Ben Chobot wrote:

>> As I see the PGSQL supports one transaction per connection. Is this
>> information ok?
>
> Yes, in postgres a connection can support only one transaction.

A small correction: a connection can support only one transaction _simultaneously_. You can serialise transactions on one connection just fine.

Alban Hertroys

--
Screwing up is an excellent way to attach something to the ceiling.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ben Chobot 2012-02-29 23:13:13 Re: Re: One transaction by connection - commit subdetails without release master transaction?
Previous Message Rich Shepard 2012-02-29 21:42:09 Re: Valid Input Syntax for Type DATE