On Oct 19, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> That could be a pretty bad worst case scenario for certain types of
> tables / usage patterns.
Given that (presumably) the database server is not failing repeatedly
without some kind of operator notification, isn't it at least somewhat
reasonable to just make "start an vacuum upon recovery from an
immediate shutdown" an operational procedure, rather than something PG
does automatically?
--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof(at)thebuild(dot)com