From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dimitri Fontaine" <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name |
Date: | 2011-04-15 02:07:19 |
Message-ID: | DBAEDF2B-A3E9-45A3-BD0C-5E94F0982B05@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>>> So far the most promising proposal I've seen seems to be to let
>>> id mean the parameter called id only when it can't refer to
>>> anything in the query.
>
>> Yeah, I've come round to that position too. I think allowing
>> parameter names to be checked only after query names is probably
>> the best answer.
>
> +1
>
> That seems the most useful and least surprising approach to me.
As part of this, can we also allow specifying an alias for the function name? That would make it far less onerous to disambiguate parameters. Unfortunately we obviously couldn't use AS as the keyword for this alias; maybe we could use ALIAS instead? IE:
CREATE FUNCTION function_with_really_really_descriptive_name (
some_parameter int
) RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL ALIAS fwrrdn AS $$
SELECT fwrrdn.some_parameter
$$;
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-04-15 02:14:35 | Re: Proposal for GSoC : ADJ dashboard (Administration related software) |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-04-15 01:38:08 | Re: Typed table DDL loose ends |