From: | Kristian Ivarsson <sten(dot)kristian(dot)ivarsson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks> |
Cc: | "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: syntax error at or near "ROWS" |
Date: | 2024-09-19 12:49:43 |
Message-ID: | DB9PR01MB9512AD039FEF5C2F462DA173F1632@DB9PR01MB9512.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Hi Dave
No, it still doesn't work with the wished statement OFFSET ? ROWS FETCH FIRST ? ROWS ONLY (because OFFSET ? LIMIT ? is non standard SQL)
The only reason I added the LIMIT-statement example was to show the differences in the behaviour
When $1 is "abc" it seems like the rest comes out as $2::int4 and $3::int4
When $1 is "abcde" it seems like rest comes out as $2 and $3
Only "abcde" works with FETCH FIRST-statement
Both "abc" and "abcde" works with the LIMIT-statement (it seems like the following parameters has different types though (as stated))
/ Kristian
> HI Kristian,
> So have you solved your issue ?
> Dave Cramer
> www.postgres.rocks
> > I have dug into this a bit more and turned on the postmaster log
> > This statement fails if the first parameter is "abc" but works with "abcde"
> > SELECT "Id","Begin","End","Logfile" FROM "ServerSession" WHERE "Logfile" = ? ORDER BY "Begin" ASC OFFSET ? ROWS FETCH FIRST ? ROW ONLY
> > The postmaster log with "abc" (cbColDef and cbValueMax both 3)
> > 2024-09-19 12:20:26.092 CEST [17828] ERROR: syntax error at or near "ROWS" at character 116
> > 2024-09-19 12:20:26.092 CEST [17828] STATEMENT: SELECT "Id","Begin","End","Logfile" FROM "ServerSession" WHERE "Logfile" = $1 ORDER BY "Begin" ASC OFFSET $2::int4 ROWS FETCH FIRST $3::int4 ROW ONLY
> > The postmaster log with "abcde" (cbColDef and cbValueMax both 5)
> > 2024-09-19 12:20:26.092 CEST [17828] LOG: execute <unnamed>: SELECT "Id","Begin","End","Logfile" FROM "ServerSession" WHERE "Logfile" = $1 ORDER BY "Begin" ASC OFFSET $2 ROWS FETCH FIRST $3 ROW ONLY
> > 2024-09-19 12:20:26.092 CEST [17828] DETAIL: parameters: $1 = 'abcde', $2 = '0', $3 = '1'
> > By changing the statement a bit (using OFFSET ? and LIMIT ?) it works with both with "abc" and "abcde"
> > 2024-09-19 12:23:40.386 CEST [32684] LOG: execute <unnamed>: SELECT "Id","Begin","End","Logfile" FROM "ServerSession" WHERE "Logfile" = $1 ORDER BY "Begin" ASC OFFSET $2::int4 LIMIT $3::int4
> > 2024-09-19 12:23:40.386 CEST [32684] DETAIL: parameters: $1 = 'abc', $2 = '0', $3 = '1'
> > 2024-09-19 12:23:40.386 CEST [32684] LOG: execute <unnamed>: SELECT "Id","Begin","End","Logfile" FROM "ServerSession" WHERE "Logfile" = $1 ORDER BY "Begin" ASC OFFSET $2 LIMIT $3
> > 2024-09-19 12:23:40.386 CEST [32684] DETAIL: parameters: $1 = 'abcde', $2 = '0', $3 = '1'
> > There's a lot of fishy things going on (where subsequent parameters sometimes seems to be serialized as strings depending of the size of earlier string but not always), but I won't speculate of the reasons
> > We want to use the OFFSET ? ROWS FETCH FIRST ? ROW ONLY statement
> > / Kristian
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2024-09-19 13:17:30 | Re: syntax error at or near "ROWS" |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2024-09-19 11:02:44 | Re: syntax error at or near "ROWS" |