| From: | Jim Nasby <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | gdavis(at)refractions(dot)net, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char) | 
| Date: | 2006-10-06 02:40:57 | 
| Message-ID: | DB91DDA2-F0F2-42CF-B5E8-A481E622F1CD@enterprisedb.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql | 
On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> regression=# select ('2006-09-15 23:59:00'::timestamp - '2006-09-01  
> 09:30:41'::timestamp);
>      ?column?
> ------------------
>  14 days 14:28:19
> (1 row)
>
> should be reporting '350:28:19' instead.
>
> This is a hack that was done to minimize the changes in the regression
> test expected outputs when we changed type interval from months/ 
> seconds
> to months/days/seconds.  But I wonder whether it wasn't a dumb idea.
> It is certainly inconsistent, as noted in the code comments.
>
> I'm tempted to propose that we remove the justify_hours call, and tell
> anyone who really wants the old results to apply justify_hours() to  
> the
> subtraction result for themselves.  Not sure what the fallout would  
> be,
> though.
I suspect there's applications out there that are relying on that  
being nicely formated for display purposes.
I agree it should be removed, but we might need a form of backwards  
compatibility for a version or two...
--
Jim Nasby                                    jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-10-06 02:41:25 | Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql | 
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-10-06 02:18:40 | Re: timestamptz alias | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Paul Argudo | 2006-10-06 09:35:30 | Re: age() vs. timestamp substraction | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-06 01:36:34 | Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char) |