Re: To all who wish to unsubscribe

From: Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: To all who wish to unsubscribe
Date: 2017-11-20 22:18:14
Message-ID: DB6PR0301MB2374F48AB95DAA8F22652347F2220@DB6PR0301MB2374.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-www

On 2017-11-20 21:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> On 11/20/2017 11:40 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> One thing I would note is that there is no longer a footer that
>> tells people what to do if they want to unsubscribe. Perhaps one
>> thing that could be done is a header (for a temporary time period)
>> that says:
>> The mailing list software of Postgresql.org has changed. Please see
>> this page on instructions on how to manage your subscription and
>> filters. And then after the temporary time period that becomes a
>> footer?
>
> Unfortunately, the removal of the footer is a feature not a bug. In
> order to be DKIM-compatible and thus help avoid becoming classified
> as spammers, we can't mangle message content anymore, just like we
> can't mangle the Subject: line.
I don't miss the footers, but see RFC 6376, "5.3.1. Body Length Limits".
Two fragments quoted are copied below:

> A body length count MAY be specified to limit the signature
> calculation to an initial prefix of the body text, measured in
> octets. If the body length count is not specified, the entire message
> body is signed.

> INFORMATIVE RATIONALE: This capability is provided because it is very
> common for mailing lists to add trailers to messages (e.g.,
> instructions on how to get off the list). Until those messages are
> also signed, the body length count is a useful tool for the Verifier
> since it can, as a matter of policy, accept messages having valid
> signatures with extraneous data.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Piotr Stefaniak 2017-11-20 22:21:21 Re: Procmail recipe for new setup
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2017-11-20 22:18:11 Re: Procmail recipe for new setup

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2017-11-20 22:46:08 Re: To all who wish to unsubscribe
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-11-20 21:52:01 Re: To all who wish to unsubscribe