From: | "K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)" <sandhya(dot)k_s(at)nokia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Itnal, Prakash (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)" <prakash(dot)itnal(at)nokia(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres abort found in 9.3.11 |
Date: | 2016-11-22 06:46:18 |
Message-ID: | DB5PR07MB15419DEB40403631733BBC71D6B40@DB5PR07MB1541.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
The setup is made of hot-standby architecture and the issue is seen during normal run with normal load of 50% insert and 50% delete operation.
During startup of the standby node, we copy the data directory from the active postgres using pg_basebackup.
Meanwhile we are trying to create a test bed for people to try.
Regards,
Sandhya
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:47 AM
To: K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) <sandhya(dot)k_s(at)nokia(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Itnal, Prakash (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) <prakash(dot)itnal(at)nokia(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres abort found in 9.3.11
"K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)" <sandhya(dot)k_s(at)nokia(dot)com> writes:
> As suggested by you, we upgraded the postgres to version 9.3.14. Also we removed all the patches we had applied before. But the issue is still observed in the latest version as well.
Can you make a test case for other people to try?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-11-22 06:49:46 | Re: Logical decoding on standby |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2016-11-22 06:24:55 | Re: postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidating prepare statement execution plan. |