From: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Commitfest Status: Sudden Death Overtime |
Date: | 2011-07-18 23:05:12 |
Message-ID: | DB2785E4-FAC9-4410-9BCC-9A93E7CE40CF@phlo.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul18, 2011, at 22:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> and an
>> error-reporting patch that Tom weighed in on over the weekend. This
>> last suffers from the issue that it's not quite clear whether Tom is
>> going to do the work or whether he's expecting the submitter to do it.
>
> If you mean the business about allowing GUCs in postgresql.conf to be
> applied even if there are semantic errors elsewhere, I'm just as happy
> to let Alexey or Florian have a go at it first, if they want. The real
> question at the moment is do we have consensus about changing that?
> Because if we do, the submitted patch is certainly not something to
> commit as-is, and should be marked Returned With Feedback.
Just to avoid false expectations here: I'd be happy to review further
versions of this patch, but I won't write them.
best regards,
Florian Pflug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-18 23:07:57 | Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-07-18 22:53:31 | Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files |