Re: Commitfest Status: Sudden Death Overtime

From: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Commitfest Status: Sudden Death Overtime
Date: 2011-07-18 23:05:12
Message-ID: DB2785E4-FAC9-4410-9BCC-9A93E7CE40CF@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul18, 2011, at 22:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> and an
>> error-reporting patch that Tom weighed in on over the weekend. This
>> last suffers from the issue that it's not quite clear whether Tom is
>> going to do the work or whether he's expecting the submitter to do it.
>
> If you mean the business about allowing GUCs in postgresql.conf to be
> applied even if there are semantic errors elsewhere, I'm just as happy
> to let Alexey or Florian have a go at it first, if they want. The real
> question at the moment is do we have consensus about changing that?
> Because if we do, the submitted patch is certainly not something to
> commit as-is, and should be marked Returned With Feedback.

Just to avoid false expectations here: I'd be happy to review further
versions of this patch, but I won't write them.

best regards,
Florian Pflug

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-07-18 23:07:57 Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-07-18 22:53:31 Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files