| From: | "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm |
| Date: | 2006-07-25 18:15:57 |
| Message-ID: | DB106B1B5B8F734B8FF3E155A3A556C202D4FD6C@clemail1.tmwsystems.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim Nasby wrote:
>
> Why is it being hard-coded? I think it makes a lot more sense to allow
> pg_bench options to be specified in the buildfarm config. Even better
> yet would be specifying them on the command line, which would allow
> members to run a more rigorous test once a day/week (I'm thinking one
> that might take 30 minutes, which could well ferret out some
> issues that
> a simple 5 minute test won't).
They absolutely won't be hard-coded. I'm asking for values to use as
defaults in the config file.
Also allowing command-line parameters is interesting, but I think we
should wait on it until the initial version is in place.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-07-25 18:19:35 | Re: On-disk bitmap index patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-25 18:02:31 | Re: Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |