From: | "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm |
Date: | 2006-07-24 04:40:35 |
Message-ID: | DB106B1B5B8F734B8FF3E155A3A556C202D4FD5C@clemail1.tmwsystems.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> 100 transactions seems barely enough to get through startup
> transients.
> Maybe 1000 would be good.
OK.
>
> I think the hard part of this is the reporting process. How
> do we track how performance varies over time? It doesn't
> seem very useful to compare different buildfarm members, but
> a longitudinal display of performance on a single buildfarm
> machine over time would be cool.
> (I'm still missing Mark Wong's daily OSDL performance reports :-()
>
I was thinking that the output from pgbench would be sent back to the
server and stored somewhere for later analysis.
> Actually the $64 question here is whether we trust pgbench as
> the standard performance test ...
I think that it's what we've got today, and if tomorrow it gets better,
then the data we get from the buildfarm will improve similarly.
Regards,
Paul Bort
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-24 04:43:14 | Re: Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-07-24 04:24:50 | Re: Adding a pgbench run to buildfarm |