From: | "Daniel J(dot) Luke" <dluke(at)geeklair(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Dutcher" <dave(at)tridecap(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Getting even more insert performance (250m+rows/day) |
Date: | 2006-05-24 20:08:06 |
Message-ID: | DAFB8564-C235-4E36-A976-A01C9371E408@geeklair.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On May 24, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Dave Dutcher wrote:
> If you can live with possible database corruption, you could try
> turning
> Fsync off. For example if you could just reinsert the data on the off
> chance a hardware failure corrupts the database, you might get a
> decent
> improvement.
I tried, but I didn't see much of an improvement (and it's not really
acceptable for this application).
> Also have you tried creating the index after you have inserted all
> your
> data? (Or maybe copy already disables the indexes while inserting?)
The data gets inserted in batches every 5 minutes and I potentially
have people querying it constantly, so I can't remove and re-create
the index.
--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke(at)geeklair(dot)net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
| Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily |
| reflect the opinions of my employer. |
+========================================================+
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel J. Luke | 2006-05-24 20:09:54 | Re: Getting even more insert performance (250m+rows/day) |
Previous Message | Steinar H. Gunderson | 2006-05-24 20:03:49 | Re: Getting even more insert performance (250m+rows/day) |