From: | Mark Aufflick <mark(at)pumptheory(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: all backends (pg7.2.3 / redhat 7.2) die due to unexpected signal 14 (SIGALRM) |
Date: | 2003-01-28 04:56:25 |
Message-ID: | DAA9078A-327C-11D7-8F93-000393C10932@pumptheory.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ahhh,
yes, um, (looks to see if anyone noticed) that would be the:
use sigtrap qw(die untrapped normal-signals stack-trace any
error-signals);
line in my code...
i will get rid of the 'untrapped normal-signals' and report back.
ta.
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 03:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Aufflick <mark(at)pumptheory(dot)com> writes:
>> DEBUG: server process (pid 971) was terminated by signal 14
>
> Hm, that's SIGALRM on my box, I assume so on yours too.
>
> AFAICT, there is no part of the Postgres code that runs with SIGALRM
> set to default handling: it's either SIG_IGN or the deadlock timer
> handler.
>
>> Both plpgsql and plperlu are used (plperlu is used for one trigger
>> function to post a single https form that sends an sms message, and
>> record the result body).
>
> I wonder whether the Perl interpreter is hacking on the SIGALRM
> setting. That would be pretty unfriendly of it (but I don't think
> Perl quite believes the notion that it might be only a subroutine
> library, and not in full control of the process...)
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrey Mosienko | 2003-01-28 05:13:32 | A powerful dump utility |
Previous Message | Jason Hihn | 2003-01-28 04:56:09 | Using RSYNC for replication? |