From: | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: clang's static checker report. |
Date: | 2009-08-27 12:39:46 |
Message-ID: | DAA43615-E02A-42A0-8A75-0363C0069A42@pointblue.com.pl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
heh, sorry folks for the noise again :/
There was a fair amount of false positives there - due to nature of
Assert() macro. Mainly, since assert_enabled is a runtime variable,
not a macro (which I sadly overlooked).
So, hardcoding it to (1) (using CPP) removed quite few false positives.
New results at:
http://zlew.org/postgresql_static_check/scan-build-2009-08-27-4/
archive at: http://zlew.org/postgresql_static_check/postgresql_static_check_27thAugust2009_2.tar.xz
Please tell me, if you think that it can be improved more.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-08-27 13:58:42 | Re: 8.5 release timetable, again |
Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2009-08-27 12:08:33 | Re: Patches for static check on geo_ops.c |