From: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007) |
Date: | 2007-09-03 09:29:47 |
Message-ID: | DA985AF7-1681-4289-B4CE-ADABFEF8634E@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Aug 31, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:53:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> So you'd be happy for *anyone* to organise an event and advertise
>> it as
>> an official PGDG event?
>
> I think my point was rather that "official" events do not, AFAICT,
> exist. There's nobody to make them official. (This is very similar,
> for instance, to "compliance" with RFCs from the IETF: there are no
> protocol police, and there's nobody to certify that anyone "complies"
> with this or that IETF document.)
>
> Consider that there are already companies claiming to do training in
> PostgreSQL who appear to be recommending things that I think are in
> fact bad ideas. Are they illegitimate? Hard to know, and even
> harder to do anything about.
And those companies should be made aware of any issues with their
training material, though perhaps a public forum isn't the best way
to do that.
Having been neck-deep in the creation of training material, it's
certainly not hard for errors to creep in, or for important things to
be left out.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-09-03 09:39:59 | Re: A renaming analogy |
Previous Message | Shashank Tripathi | 2007-09-03 02:14:43 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |