On 6/8/18, 1:12 PM, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
I'm not terribly opposed to this, but I wonder if the much more
pragmatic solution is to just occasionally call a database function that
checks this? You could just run SELECT 1 occasionally :/
After further discussion with our team:
Would this work if the reason for it ignoring the cancel request is that it is already performing a long-running spi_exec with a large response?