| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age? |
| Date: | 2023-04-14 12:33:44 |
| Message-ID: | D97284DD-10E8-48F0-A843-809DB99474BB@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 14 Apr 2023, at 14:30, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> ..as Peter rightly says, XID age is likely a poor proxy for
> whatever people really care about, so I don't think continuing to have
> a setting that works like that is a good plan.
Agreed, and removing it is likely to be a good vehicle for figuring out what we
should have instead (if anything).
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-04-14 12:37:30 | Re: Wrong results from Parallel Hash Full Join |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-04-14 12:30:30 | Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age? |