Re: Updated tsearch documentation

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Updated tsearch documentation
Date: 2007-07-17 21:35:54
Message-ID: D9635993-A1A4-41DB-95FB-DC784E87BC32@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers


On Jul 17, 2007, at 16:24 , Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I assume my_filter_name is optional right? I have updated the
> prototype
> to be:
>
> tsearch([vector_column_name], [my_filter_name], text_column_name
> [, ... ])

Just a style point, but would [filter_name] be better than
[my_filter_name]? You're not qualifying the others with my_ ... or is
there something you want to tell us, Bruce? :)

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-17 21:46:45 Re: Updated tsearch documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-17 21:30:17 Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-17 21:46:45 Re: Updated tsearch documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-17 21:24:09 Re: Updated tsearch documentation