From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Michael Giannakopoulos *EXTERN*" <miccagiann(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: About aggregates... |
Date: | 2012-11-30 09:08:26 |
Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C208C0C9B3@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Michael Giannakopoulos wrote:
> I would like to ask if there is any way to make an aggregate function
to take a set of tuples as an
> input variable. I know that an actual aggregate function receives each
tuple one at a time and process
> it on the fly. However I want to store tuples in an incremental
fashion so as to process them in a
> batch approach in the finalaggr function. Think for example
implementing logistic regression (which is
> an OLAP query by its nature). I want to support it with the current
features that PostgreSQL provides
> from which the closest feature is an aggregate. However an aggregate
function feeds me one a tuple for
> each call, but I would like to have access to a batch of tuples per
function call. Is there any
> possible way to perform something like this?
If you write in C, there is nothing that keeps you from
storing all the rows that come in in memory allocated in
a suitable MemoryContext and process them all at the end.
You might run out of memory though.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | maxxedev maxxedev | 2012-11-30 09:29:38 | postgres timestamp data errors |
Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2012-11-30 09:04:55 | Re: libpq - PQsendQuery wait for complete result |