Re: Streaming replication failed to start scenarios

From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "chinnaobi *EXTERN*" <chinnaobi(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication failed to start scenarios
Date: 2012-10-22 14:34:18
Message-ID: D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2089A54AE@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

chinnaobi wrote:
> I have tested using cygwin rsync in windows 2008 R2, just after
restart the
> server.
>
> for 10 GB it took nearly 5 minutes to sync,
> for 50 GB it took nearly 30 minutes, -- too long Though there were no
big
> changes.
>
> My requirement is something less than 5 minutes. I am doing high
> availability. In my setup there is WAL archiving enabled as well.
>
> Is there any way I can speedup the configuring dead primary server to
> standby ??

Faster network, faster disks :^(

Why is it time critical to build a new standby?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Angelico 2012-10-22 14:50:25 Re: Postgres Login Users Details
Previous Message Matt Savona 2012-10-22 14:31:17 streaming replication and data file consistency