From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Rafal Pietrak *EXTERN*" <rafal(at)zorro(dot)isa-geek(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: foreign key from array element |
Date: | 2012-09-18 07:37:21 |
Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2086C1A4A@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 14:31 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Rafal Pietrak <rafal(at)zorro(dot)isa-geek(dot)com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:58 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> > >> On 09/17/2012 04:46 PM, Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> > > [--------------]
> > >> There was some quite recent discussion on ELEMENT foreign keys on the
> > >> -hackers list. Try searching pgsql-hackers for ELEMENT foreign key.
> [------------]
> > It appears to be awaiting review, so the earliest possible release to
> > contain would be 9.3. My entirely arbitrary (and likely incorrect!)
> > estimation puts at about 80% chance of making 9.3, 10% chance off some
> > later release, and 10% chance of rejection or getting dropped.
> I hope it'll not end up in that 10% bin.
>
> Who can review that patch?
You :^)
The list of patches for the commitfest is here:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=15
There is no reviewer for "Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys" yet.
Here is information about what is required:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
Remember that even a review that does not cover everything
is valuable.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | xoip | 2012-09-18 07:53:34 | Re: How to access the extension's operator installed with schema ? |
Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2012-09-18 07:13:24 | Re: log_destination = csvlog, line breaks interfere in analysis |