From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Lonni J Friedman *EXTERN*" <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: how to measure wal_buffer usage |
Date: | 2012-03-16 15:09:02 |
Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C207A2AAE3@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Lonni J Friedman wrote:
>>> After reading this interesting article on shared_buffers and wal_buffers:
>>> http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2012/03/tuning-sharedbuffers-and-walbuffers.html
>>>
>>> it got me wondering if my settings were ideal. Is there some way to
>>> measure wal_buffer usage in real time, so that I could simply monitor
>>> it for some period of time, and then come up with a way of determining
>>> if the current setting is sufficient?
>>>
>>> I tried googling, but every reference that I've found simply defaults
>>> to the "trial & error" approach to performance tuning.
>>
>> You can use the contrib module pg_buffercache to inspect the shared buffers.
>> If almost all your shared buffers have high use count (4 or 5),
>> shared_buffers may be too small. If not, consider reducing shared_buffers.
>
> pg_buffercache only reports on the buffer_cache, it does not report
> any data on the wal_cache.
You are right.
>> It's probably better to start with a moderate value and tune upwards.
>>
>> You can also look at pg_statio_all_tables and pg_statio_all_indexes and
>> calculate the buffer hit ratio. If that is low, that's also an indication
>> that shared_buffers is too small.
>
> Isn't this also specific to the buffer_cache rather than the wal_cache?
Correct.
I don't know how to inspect usage WAL cache usage.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-03-16 15:20:25 | Re: serial- sequence priveleges |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-03-16 14:40:02 | Re: serial- sequence priveleges |