| From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Shigeru Hanada *EXTERN*" <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Kohei KaiGai" <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Etsuro Fujita" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
| Date: | 2012-03-06 14:47:39 |
| Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2079500DD@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> Connection should be closed only when the trigger is a
> top level transaction and it's aborting, but isTopLevel flag was not
> checked. I fixed the bug and added regression tests for such cases.
I wondered about that - is it really necessary to close the remote
connection? Wouldn't a ROLLBACK on the remote connection be good enough?
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Misa Simic | 2012-03-06 14:48:21 | Re: Pg 9.2 extension install |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-06 14:32:17 | Re: CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3) |