From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Malm Paul *EXTERN*" <paul(dot)malm(at)saabgroup(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: changing from postgreSQL 8.3 to 9.0 |
Date: | 2011-09-26 13:32:20 |
Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C206E9F943@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Malm Paul wrote:
> I have a database created on ver 8.3 an have restored the database in
a new database in PostgreSQL
> 9.0.
> In the database i'm using a column storing "bytea".
>
> When trying to read the database with my java application, I have
problems reading from the bytea-
> stream.
> Integers read is not correct. I can see that there is something new in
ver 9.0: LC_COLLATE. Has that
> someting to do with my problem reading from "bytea".
> If so, what is the easiest way to get around this problem, when
importing the database that is created
> in PostgreSQL 8.3?
Collation or encoding matter only for textual data, not for binary data.
Did you update your JDBC driver to a version that supports 9.0?
With an old JDBS driver, you might have problems with the new
bytea encoding format in 9.0. You can test by setting
bytea_output to "escape" in postgresql.conf and see if that
works around the problem.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-09-26 13:39:53 | Re: bytea insert difference between 8.3 and 9.x |
Previous Message | Gregg Jaskiewicz | 2011-09-26 13:01:12 | Re: Does postgresql 9.0.4 use index on PREFIX%SUFFIX queries? |