From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Simon Windsor *EXTERN*" <simon(dot)windsor(at)cornfield(dot)me(dot)uk>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres performance and the Linux scheduler |
Date: | 2011-06-17 07:39:17 |
Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2068E5962@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Simon Windsor wrote:
> Can the performance of Postgres be boosted, especially on busy
systems, using the none default
> DEADLINE Scheduler?
I think that mostly depends on your storage.
I personally have made one experience where (after weeks of trying
everything
else) I changed the scheduler from CFQ to deadline and immediately got
about
four times better performance. The storage in this case was a SAN.
I don't have enough experience, but my guess is that the smarter your
storage
is, the less the kernel should try to optimize I/O. I assume that in my
case
the kernel's optimizations (which try to optimize things for a physical
hard drive)
and the SAN's optimizations got in each other's way.
As I think is the case for all performance questions, there cannot be a
certain
answer -- the best thing is for you to try it out and see if it does
something for you.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2011-06-17 07:58:57 | Re: Invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xedbebf |
Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2011-06-17 06:46:50 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4.8 bringing my website down every evening |