Re: Substitutes for some Oracle packages

From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "Arnold, Sandra *EXTERN*" <ArnoldS(at)osti(dot)gov>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Substitutes for some Oracle packages
Date: 2009-09-18 07:04:06
Message-ID: D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C203937F20@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Sandra Arnold wrote:
> We are in the process of migrating from Oracle to PostgreSQL.
> One of the things that we are needing to find out is what to
> use in place of Oracle supplied functionality such as
> "DBMS_OUTPUT" and "UTL_FILE". We are currently using this
> type of functionality in Stored Procedures and packages.
> What are the options in PostgreSQL for replacing these two
> packages in a stored procedure/function?

RAISE NOTICE has been mentioned.

Apart from the possibility to write file I/O functions in Perl,
there are some functions that are already included in PostgreSQL:
pg_read_file and pg_stat_file.
The contrib module "adminpack" provides pg_file_write,
pg_file_rename, pg_file_unlink.

Together these are enough for simple file system access,
although they don't provide as much as UTL_FILE.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message el dorado 2009-09-18 11:17:46 Re[3]: Problems with pg_dump for PG8.4 for WinXP (MinGW build)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-09-18 04:24:14 Re: PostgreSQL nonstandard use of escape in a string literal