From: | "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Performance increase with elevator=deadline |
Date: | 2008-04-11 11:22:04 |
Message-ID: | D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C201FA62C8@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
This refers to the performance problem reported in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2008-04/msg00052.php
After some time of trial and error we found that changing the I/O scheduling
algorithm to "deadline" improved I/O performance by a factor 4 (!) for
this specific load test.
It seems that the bottleneck in this case was actually in the Linux kernel.
Since performance statements are useless without a description of
the system and the type of load, I'll send a few details to make this
report more useful for the archives:
The machine is a PC with 8 AMD Opteron 885 CPUs and 32 GB RAM, attached to
a HP EVA 8100 storage system with 72 disks.
We are running 64-bit Linux 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 from RedHat Enterprise 5.1.
The I/O queue depth is set to 64.
Our benchmark tools show a possible I/O performance of about 11000 transactions
per second for random scattered reads of 8k blocks.
PostgreSQL version is 8.2.4.
The database system is a cluster with 6 databases containing tables up
to a couple of GB in size. The whole database cluster takes about
200 GB of storage.
The database load is a set of read-only statements, several of which have
miserable execution plans and perform table and index scans.
With the default I/O scheduler we observe a performance of about
600 I/O transactions or 7 MB per second.
After booting with elevator=deadline both values increase by a factor
of up to 4 and the query response times sink drastically.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Weimer | 2008-04-11 14:05:00 | Re: Creating large database of MD5 hash values |
Previous Message | PFC | 2008-04-11 10:41:15 | Re: Partitioned tables - planner wont use indexes |